Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Testimonies of Some Professing/Professed Christians



I decided to blog a list of notable professing/professed Christian testimonies (or biographies). By notable, I don't necessarily mean they are genuine Christian testimonies. For example, there are some testimonies that involve claims of supernatural events and occurrences. While I believe that God still works supernaturally in the world, I also believe that there are spiritual counterfeits (not to mention con artists and frauds who knowingly make false claims).

Having said that, there are some testimonies here which I believe are from genuine Christians. Some of whom I highly respect and admire. Given those caveats, know that listening to testimonies and accepting them is like purchasing goods and services. The buyer should beware (caveat emptor).
Some of these are videos and others are in written format.

Christian intellectuals
Love The Lord with Heart and Mind
Various Evangelical intellectuals and scholars answer a questionnaire about their Christian experience.
https://calvindude.org/ebooks/stevehays/Love-the-Lord-with-Heart-and-Mind.pdf
If the above link goes dead, search for it at the main Triablogue website HERE.

Dr. Michael L. Brown testimony from his website
http://askdrbrown.org/about-dr-brown/personal-testimony

Dr. Michael L. Brown testimony (part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVBg1cEedSk&feature=channel&list=UL

Brown's Testimony on It's Supernatural TV show
http://youtu.be/WCYlWNKGc_g

Brown's Testimony "From LSD to PhD" on Think It Thru
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK3bDDVQYhg&feature=share&list=PL537B5C72819368BB
or HERE http://youtu.be/TvW44gbk3CY



William Lane Craig's Conversion Testimony

World renowned Christian apologist William Lane Craig shares his conversion testimony to Christianity. Well known in the atheist community, Craig has had numerous debates with leading atheists and Muslims. He has debated or dialogued with three of the "Four Horsemen of New Atheism" (D. Dennett, S. Harris, C. Hitchens). The fourth, Richard Dawkins, refuses to debate Craig. Fellow atheist and Oxford doctor of philosophy Daniel Came implied that Dawkins' refusal could be interpreted as "cowardice" on his part. Dawkins seems to be willing to make any excuse so that he doesn't have to debate Craig one on one. Atheist Luke Muehlhauser wrote, "As far as I can tell, he [Craig] has won nearly all his debates with atheists...I’m not the only one who thinks Craig has won nearly all his debates. For some atheists, it is rather maddening." Regarding the Craig/Hitchens debate, he said Craig won so convincingly that, "Frankly, Craig spanked Hitchens like a foolish child." Atheist scholar (and Champion of sorts) Richard Carrier admitted that he lost his debate against Craig. Sam Harris, in his debate against Craig started out by saying (tongue-in-cheek) that Craig was "...the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the 'fear of God' into many of my fellow atheists [at 27 minutes and 40 seconds]" because many of his atheist friends begged him to make sure he did not lose the debate. Atheist leader John W. Loftus wrote immediately after the Craig/Harris debate that "Bill (Craig) has once again showed himself as the best debater of this generation, that's for sure."

Craig's numerous debate opponents have included:
Frank Zindler (in 1993), who served as interim president of the atheist organization American Atheists in 2008.
Paul Kurtz, considered by some to be the "father of modern secular humanism".
Antony Flew, who was one of the most noted atheist philosophers in the 20th Century.
A. C. Grayling, future Vice-president of the British Humanist Association.

William Lane Craig's Testimony (Highly Recommended)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkAAE2_vLsY 
The Impact the Resurrection Has on Craig (Highly Recommended)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iyxR8uE9GQ&feature=youtu.be&t=56m13s
Why William Lane Craig is a Christian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJd9XMJW9xc&NR=1
About the "Sandy" that led William Lane Craig to the Lord
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/sandy-tiffan-ackerman
An article on Craig at The Chronicle of Higher Education
The New Theist: How William Lane Craig became Christian philosophy's boldest apostle
http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/
William Lane Craig's favorite philosopher is Alvin Plantinga
http://youtu.be/c09N0JuT27A

Alvin Plantinga's Spiritual Autobiography
http://www.calvin.edu/125th/wolterst/p_bio.pdf


Steve Hays
Why I Believe: A Positive Apologetic (part 1)
Why I Believe: I'm Glad You Asked! (part 2)
Steve also contributed to the above questionnaire "Love The Lord with Heart and Mind"

Craig Keener
http://sites.google.com/site/drckeener/faithstory

C.S. Lewis (dramatized documentary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydyCqhzVZVE
different portion of same documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brMKhhbQShU
The Comparative World Views of two Great Thinkers in the 20th Century, C. S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtL2wHhtW2A&feature=channel&list=UL

James White
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9f7F0A7dgM

Scientists who are Christian
Francis Collins (head of Human Genome Project)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qygy14tC3I&feature=related

Hugh Ross (astrophysicist)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zmzAdqqLks


Christian pastors, evangelists, motivational speakers etc.
Franklin Graham
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjdDY7pbUyQ

The Life Story of Erwin Lutzer (talks about destiny decisions)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShK9KNceacA

Lutzer's impersonation of Billy Graham
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZYqyKT1XNM

Link

David Ring (born with cerebral palsy)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Jhc50qGnF0

Matt Slick's Testimony
http://carm.org/matt-slicks-testimony

Sam Storms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfpvyNhb7y4

Nick Vujicic (born without arms or legs) [CBN version 8 minutes]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl58qufXfYk

Nick Vujicic part 1 of 11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snDQe3tWwRQ


Celebrities, Athletes and Singers
I'm hesitant to include celebrities and athletes because I suspect that many aren't as committed to being and living as Christians as they appear. Nevertheless, here are some that are interesting to me.

Mike Singletary's Testimony
http://youtu.be/SgGODeY3iAY

Michael Chang's Testimony
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL1-84YD_tg&feature=channel&list=UL

Jeremy Lin's Testimony
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ61OkF3qDk&feature=channel&list=UL

Tim Tebow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIpVjFnr9iI&feature=channel&list=UL

The Keith Green Story
http://youtu.be/fXOhSScVMUs



Christian testimonies that contain difficult to believe claims. You decide if they seem credible or not.

Ian McCormack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=-MBeiwIewtE&NR=1

Kamal Saleem a former Jihadist becomes a Christian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKR6IKvha1Q

Miscellaneous testimonies
Peter Hitchens (brother of famous atheist Christopher Hitchens)
http://vimeo.com/10354237

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Resources for Dealing with Alleged Bible Contradictions, Discrepancies and Errors

[As far as I know, there are no illegal links to copyrighted materials]

Introductory resources for alleged Bible "Contradictions", "Discrepancies" and "Errors". Or what I like to call "Bible CDEs" for short. Some of these resources are texts while others are in audio format.

One of my all time favorite apologists is Steve Hays.
Below are links to his paper "Why I Believe"

"Triablogue" is where he and the other "Triabloggers" blog on apologetical issues. Here's the website:

Triablogue
www.triablogue.blogspot.com


Why I Believe by Steve Hays part 1: A Positive Apologetic
thirdmill.org/newfiles/ste_hays/PT.Hays.Why.Believe.apologetics.1.pdf


Why I Believe by Steve Hays part 2: I'm Glad You Asked!
thirdmill.org/newfiles/ste_hays/PT.Hays.Why.Believe.apologetics.2.pdf


In part 2 he deals with Biblical criticism and succinctly notes that, "Inerrancy is perfectly compatible with selective reporting, topical sequencing, paraphrastic citation, round numbers, variant names, and literary dependence."
He obviously says more, and so I recommend one reads the entire section.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
Gill's commentary often addresses many classic CDEs.
http://www.freegrace.net/gill/

 or
http://www.godrules.net/library/gill/gill.htm
or
http://www.studylight.org/com/geb/  

Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary
Clarke's commentary often addresses many classic CDEs.
http://www.studylight.org/com/acc/

or 
http://www.godrules.net/library/clarke/clarke.htm

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
by Jamieson, Fausset and Brown often addresses many classic CDEs.

http://
ww.ccel.org/ccel/jamieson/jfb

or
http://www.studylight.org/com/jfb/


What is Inerrancy? audio podcast with William Lane Craig
http://www.apologetics315.com/2008/12/what-is-inerrancy-william-lane-craig.html


The Inerrancy of Scripture by Kevin Vanhoozer
http://www.theologynetwork.org/christian-beliefs/the-bible/getting-stuck-in/the-inerrancy-of-scripture.htm

Norman Geisler's When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties 


Difficulties in the Bible: Alleged Errors and Contradictions by R.A. Torrey


Countering Bible Contradictions
http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/bible.htm
(this link is down, so I think I found another copy below)


http://www.philvaz.com/apologetics/bible.htm


Contradicting Bible Contradictions
http://www.contradictingbiblecontradictions.com/


300 Alleged Bible Contradictions Answered
https://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2024/02/07/300-alleged-bible-contradictions-answered/

Hard Sayings of the Bible by Walter C. Kaiser

Steve Gregg's lecture series titled "Authority of Scriptures" can be listened to at this link:
http://www.thenarrowpath.com/topical_lectures.php
Link
The most relevant are parts 5, 7 and 8 (HIGHLY RECOMMENDED)

05. Historical Accuracy of the Bible
http://www.thenarrowpath.com/mp3s/aut/aut05.mp3


07. Alleged Discrepancies - Part 1
http://www.thenarrowpath.com/mp3s/aut/aut07.mp3


08. Alleged Discrepancies - Part 2
http://www.thenarrowpath.com/mp3s/aut/aut08.mp3


The Inerrancy of Scripture lectures by Wayne Grudem
(based on his book Introduction to Systematic Theology)

part 1
http://scottsdalebible.com/assets/audio/christian-essentials/20051009WGrudem.mp3


part 2
http://scottsdalebible.com/assets/audio/christian-essentials/20051016WGrudem.mp3


part 3
http://scottsdalebible.com/assets/audio/christian-essentials/20051106WGrudem.mp3


For all the lectures by Wayne Grudem based on his book, visit this link:
http://www.christianessentialssbc.com/messages/


Or here:
http://www.monergism.com/mp3/2012/02/systematic_theology_mp3_lectur.php



Do the Gospels Contradict Themselves? by Michael Licona (43 min. video)
http://youtu.be/LTKYB9F3I84

Do the Gospels Contradict? by Michael Licona
www.apologetics315.com/2012/07/do-gospels-contradict-by-michael-licona.html


 Mike Licona Discusses What Makes a Bible Contradiction
http://youtu.be/TJ8rZukh_Bc

Mike Licona interviewed by Frank Turek on Bible Contradictions
http://www.apologetics315.com/2013/01/michael-licona-on-bible-contradictions.html

The A, B, Cs . . . Ds Es of Defending the Gospels - Dr. Mike Licona 
http://youtu.be/1_I4OkShxh8

Why are there differences in the Gospels? - Mike Licona
http://youtu.be/vYfSf9NgeOQ

Why are there differences in the Gospels? - Mike Licona
http://youtu.be/xtemSTrkogE  (same lecture as above given at a different time)

Gospel Differences & Compositional Textbooks 
http://youtu.be/VZvwRyduNSM


Webinar: Why Are There Differences Between the Gospels? A Conversation with Dr. Michael Licona
http://youtu.be/pUajktSCaeo


Articles (mostly) by Norman Geisler on the "Licona Controversy"
http://normangeisler.net/articles/Bible/Inspiration-Inerrancy/Licona/default.htm  

Is Genre Criticism of the Gospels Contrary to the Inerrancy of Scripture? by Norman Geisler
http://normangeisler.net/articles/Bible/Inspiration-Inerrancy/GenreCriticismOfGospelsAndInerrancy.htm

Mike Licona Responds to Norman Geisler
http://youtu.be/TnvJu8LTsL8

 I also recommend the blogs on the "Licona Controversy" at Triablogue-
For example:

The resurrected saints (9/12/11) 
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/resurrected-saints.html
Hubner on Licona (9/12/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/hubner-on-licona.html
Geisler responds to Licona (9/13/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/geisler-responds-to-licona.html
Something Close to Biblicism (9/13/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/something-close-to-biblicism.html
Geisler adversus Geisler (9/14/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/geisler-adversus-geisler.html
Licona responds to Mohler (9/15/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/licona-responds-to-mohler.html
Father Church (9/15/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/father-church.html
Just in the Nick of time (9/15/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/just-in-nick-of-time.html
Lumpkins disposable morals  (9/16/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/lumpkins-disposable-morals.html
Odds and Enns (9/16/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/odds-and-enns.html
Early Christian And Non-Christian Interpretations Of The Matthew 27 Phenomena (9/16/11) 

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/early-christian-and-non-christian.html
The Doctrine of Inspiration and the World of the Ancient Near East (9/16/11) 

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/doctrine-of-inspiration-and-world-of.html
"An Inconsistent Argument Against Inerrancy" (9/16/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/inconsistent-argument-against-inerrancy.html
Geisler's selective prooftexting (9/18/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/geislers-selective-prooftexting.html
The day hope died (9/18/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/day-hope-died.html
The blessed hope (9/19/11) 

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/blessed-hope.html
Penultimate thoughts on the Licona controversy (9/19/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/penultimate-thoughts-on-licona.html
Inerrancy and hermeneutics  (9/19/11)  

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/09/inerrancy-and-hermeneutics.html
When the Saints Go Marching In (11/19/11) 

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/11/when-saints-go-marching-in.html
Beckwith misstates Catholic theology (12/3/11) 

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/12/beckwith-misstates-catholic-theology.html
Roundtable Discussion Of Matthew 27:52-53 (7/31/12) 

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/07/roundtable-discussion-of-matthew-2752-53.html
Gospel Contradictions
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2016/01/gospel-contradictions.html
(read in connection with Lydia McGrew's post:
A gospel fictionalization theory is no help to the gospel

http://whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2016/02/gospel_fictionalization_theory.html)
Police videos and Gospel harmonization
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2016/02/police-videos-and-gospel-harmonization.html
Gospel harmonization
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2016/02/gospel-harmonization.html
Jesus remembered
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2016/02/jesus-remembered.html



CONTRADICTIONS IN THE GOSPEL BOOKS? LESSONS FROM THE WORLD JUNIOR HOCKEY CHAMPIONSHIPS
http://www.truthinmydays.com/contradictions-in-the-gospel-books-lessons-from-the-world-junior-hockey-

championships/

Contradictions in the Bible accounts of Jesus rising from the dead?
http://youtu.be/hA6g46R-adg


Discrepancies in the Gospels with W. Hall Harris and Darrell Bock
http://youtu.be/C651fVKKehg

Darrell Bock on Bible Contradictions

http://www.thinkchristianly.org/interview-with-darrell-bock-on-bible-contradictions-podcast/

Inerrancy and the Gospels: A God-Centered Approach to the Challenges of Harmonization by Vern Poythress (book)
http://www.frame-poythress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/PoythressVernInerrancyAndTheGospels.pdf 


Inerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Chalenges to the Bible by Vern Poythress
http://www.frame-poythress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/PoythressVernInerrancyAndWorldview.pdf


Inerrancy, Harmonization and the Synoptic Gospels: A Response to Darrell Bock by Vern Poythress
http://www.frame-poythress.org/inerrancy-harmonization-and-the-synoptic-gospels-a-response-to-darrell-bock/


Logic by Vern Poythress
http://www.frame-poythress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/BLogicFinal.pdf

Presuppositions and Harmonization: Luke 23:47 as a Test Case by Vern Poythress
http://www.frame-poythress.org/presuppositions-and-harmonization-luke-2347-as-a-test-case/


Dan Olinger on Bible Contradictions (part 1 and 2)
From his series on apologetics
www.apologetics315.com/2009/07/apologetics-mp3-audio-series-by-dan.html
part 1
http://mp3.sa-media.com/filearea/8240819465710/8240819465710.mp3

part 2
http://mp3.sa-media.com/filearea/824081953190/824081953190.mp3

Resolutions to Bible Contradictions by Apologetics Press website
http://apologeticspress.com/AllegedDiscrepancies.aspx


A Bible Commentary for Muslims
http://answering-islam.org/BibleCom/index.html


Errors and Contradictions in the Bible? from the Answering Islam website
http://answering-islam.org/Bible/Contra/index.html


101 Cleared-Up "Contradictions" in the Bible! By: Jay Smith, Alex Chowdhry, Toby Jepson, James Schaeffer
http://www.debate.org.uk/debate-topics/apologetic/contrads/

Introduction to Bible Difficulties and Bible Contradictions by Matt Slick
http://carm.org/introduction-bible-difficulties-and-bible-contradictions

E.W. Bullinger's unique way of resolving alleged CDEs can be found by reading the Appendixes to his The Companion Bible.
Some of his resolutions are far-fetched and clearly ad hoc. While others may have some merit.

Appendixes to The Companion Bible
www.levendwater.org/companion/index_companion.html

An example of one of resolutions which at first seemed ad hoc to me, but now seems plausible is the seeming contradiction of whether both criminals reviled Christ or whether one of them honored him.
He deals with it in appendix 164 THE "OTHERS"CRUCIFIED WITH THE LORD
John W. Schoenheit does a great job explaining Bullinger's resolution in this YouTube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxvE8zKZJk4
This might be the same John Schoenheit who was once associated with the cult "The Way International". I post the link to the video only for the specific topic of the alleged contradiction. I don't endorse all of this person's theology (whoever he is).

Another work by Bullinger that can be helpful in resolving apparent contradictions is his book

Figures of Speech Used in the Bible

For the sake of fairness here's a link to the website which has the most comprehensive list of alleged Bible contradictions from a skeptics point of view. Fortunately, and to the credit of the website's author, the website also has links to responses and resolutions offered by other people on other websites. The famous (or for some infamous) website is:

The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (SAB)
www.skepticsannotatedbible.com


Christian Responses to the SAB:
www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/christian.html

A similar site to the SAB is Errancy.com. Though the website lists passages that suggest Biblical errancy, there are nevertheless interesting comments that people have posted that make some sense as to how some of these discrepancies can be resolved.

Dave Armstrong's Master List of Christian Internet Resources for Bible Difficulties
http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2010/07/alleged-bible-contradictions.html


Six Factors That Do Not Affect Inerrancy by C. Michael Patton
http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2014/02/six-factors-that-do-not-affect-inerrancy/



Some links to some comments I've made on blogs concerning Inerrancy.

Words of light and life
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/01/words-of-light-and-life.html


One angel or two?
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/04/one-angel-or-two.html


For more of my comments on this topic and various topics, one can go to this page:

My Comments on Other Blogs
http://gospelcrumbs.blogspot.com/2011/12/my-comments-on-other.html


Answering Moral Objections to the Bible 

Book Reviews of Recent Atheist Authors by Christian Apologists
http://misclane.blogspot.com/2013/09/book-reviews-of-recent-atheist-authors.html


Future planned additions to this blog will include:
-Recommended books in defense of Inerrancy
-Further resources for specific CDEs








Saturday, June 30, 2012

Roger Olson and The Hamburglar: Twins Separated At Birth OR Reformed Fugitive Hiding In Plain Sight?





















Note: By "Reformed" we don't mean "Calvinistic". Being an Arminian, he's not THAT Reformed.

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

What a Non-Christian Can Teach Us About Time



Randy Pausch Lecture: Time Management

The Lord Jesus said in Luke 16:8 "The master commended the dishonest manager for his shrewdness. For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light."

If there's some truth to the saying "time is gold", then we can apply Christ's teaching on stewardship not only to money, but to time. Especially since unlike money, lost time cannot be regained/re-earned no matter how hard we work. If we all lived 1000 years before we eventually died, we could all save and invest enough money to become millionaires. The problem with all of us becoming millionaires is the shortage of time. Time is the most precious commodity we have from God and to use for God. Here's a lecture by Randy Pausch on time management. It's all the more focused since he was dying from incurable pancreatic cancer at the time. Some of his recommendations can by applied by Christians, while others obviously cannot. But it's unfortunately that more Christians don't know about and apply the insights Pausch shares in this lecture. Died July 25, 2008 (aged 47)








Monday, March 5, 2012

Concerning 1 John 5:20 ( from The Trinity: Evidences and Issues)


↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
UPDATE: THIS BLOGPOST HAS BEEN REPLACED.
A VERSION WITH MORE QUOTES CAN BE READ HERE
.
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑  

The following is a passage from pages 354-357 of Robert Morey's book "The Trinity: Evidences and Issues." I didn't bother to reproduce the Greek text. I also highlighted some passages in red colored font for emphasis.


QUOTE:

We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true-even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life (I John 5:20 NIV)

The editors of the New International Version were so certain that John was calling Jesus [Greek] "the true God and eternal life" that they used "He is" instead of "This is" so the English reader could not miss the point. This translation could be made in the later half of the twentieth century because most scholars, liberal as well as conservative, were now in agreement that the name "Jesus Christ" was grammatically the antecedent for the pronoun [Greek] 190

This passage, more than any other, illustrates the importance of following the normal rules of Greek grammar. The word [Greek] is a pronoun. No one can disagree with this. As a pronoun, [Greek] would naturally refer back to the person just mentioned. No one can disagree with this either. Robertson states the rule:

[Greek] does, as a rule, refer to what is near or last mentioned and [Greek] to what is remote. 191

But what about the few exceptions where [Greek] acts like [Greek] and refers not to the person immediately in view, but to someone before him? Anyone who is at all familiar with ancient literature knows that such "exceptions" do appear form time to time. For example, a writer can mix genders or numbers. But such "exceptions" do not disprove the general rule that genders and numbers should agree.

That there may be a a few rare exceptions to a general rule does not mean that one should approach a text of Scripture with the a priori assumption that it will be an exception to the normal rules of grammar. Instead, we should approach a text with the a priori assumption that the normal rules of grammar and syntax will apply unless there are clear grammatical reasons to depart form those rules.

Please notice that we said "grammatical" - not "theological" - reasons. Just because the grammar of a text leads to an idea which contradicts what you believe, this does not give you the right to throw grammar to the wind. Theology cannot overthrow or ignore the grammar of the sacred text. It can only bow before it.

Many people today ignore the grammar of the original text and instead interpret the Bible from their "feelings." Besides being a form of exegetical suicide in which one slits his own throat with the rusty blade of relativism, Christ and the apostles used grammar and not their "feelings" as the rule of interpretation.

In Matthew 22:32, Jesus used the distinction between the past tense "was" and the present tense "is" as proof that there is a conscious afterlife. The apostle Paul in Galatians 3:16 based his argument that Christ was preached to Abraham on the distinction between the singular and plural forms of the word "seed." They used the rules of grammar as the proof of their theology.

The Greek text of I John 5:20 is simple and straightforward. John used [Greek] fifty-five times in his writings. Thus, we are not talking about a rare usage of a rare word. There are plenty of places in John's writings where [Greek] was used in the same kind of construction as found in I John 5:20 and no one has any problem with [Greek] referring back to the antecedent.

Does anyone question whether [Greek] refers to "Judas" in John 6:71? No. Does anyone object to [Greek] in John 1:41 referring back to the "Andrew" mentioned in v.40? No. Or that [Greek] in John 1:30 refers back to "Jesus" in v. 29? No. Where are all the angry denials that [Greek] in John 6:46 refers to Jesus as [Greek]? Has anyone ever denied that in II John 9 [Greek] refers back to [Greek]? No.

Why then all the hysteria over whether [Greek] refers to Jesus in I John 5:20? Obviously, it is not the grammar or syntax of the Greek that causes people to question whether [Greek] refers to Jesus Christ per se. It is that it refers to Him as God. That is the real issue.

If the text read, [Greek] ("Jesus Christ. This is Eternal Life"), there would [sic] no controversy whatsoever. [Greek] would be seen as referring to [Greek]. But once you add [Greek] to the phrase, then the controversy begins.

The evidence for Jesus being called "the true God" and "Eternal Life" is quite strong:

1. The general rule on pronouns is that it modifies the immediate antecedent. This means Jesus Christ.

Brown: Grammar favors a reference to the nearest antecedent, and this would be "Jesus Christ." In this case Jesus Christ is called true God. 192

Candlish: The Lord Jesus Christ is the person here meant. Such seems to be the fair inference from the use of the pronoun "this;" which naturally and usually indicates the nearest person spoken of in the context; and therefore, in this instance, not "him that is true," but "his Son Jesus Christ." That inference indeed is so clear, in a merely grammatical and exegetical point of view, that there would not probably have been any doubt about it, were it not for its implying an assertion of our Lord's supreme divinity; an assertion which no sophistry or special pleading can evade or explain away. 193

Morgan and Cox: There can be no doubt they refer to Jesus Christ. We are shut up to this conclusion by the construction of the passage. Christ is the near and natural antecedent to the assertion of the apostle. 194

Marshall: The NIV rightly adopts the view that [Greek] refers back to Jesus. 195

For the last time John hammers home the point. He-Jesus- is the true God and eternal life. Here, as in the Gospel (Jn. 1:1; 20:28; cf. 1:18 mg.), John declare that Jesus is the true God. 196

2. The Granville Sharp rule once again applies. The phrase [Greek] is composed of two nouns separated by [Greek] with the first noun having the article and the second noun without the article. This means that only one person is in view. He is called "Eternal Life" as well as "God." Thus, the idea that [Greek] refers to an abstract concept, and not to a person, is eviscerated by the grammar.

3. While John elsewhere refers to Jesus as "Eternal Life" (I John 1:2), the Father is never called "Eternal Life." More importantly in the immediate context, since Jesus is "eternal life," then to have Him in your heart is to have eternal life (I John 5:11-12). In John's writings [Greek] "Eternal life" refers to Jesus.

4. John applies the adjective [Greek] "true" to Jesus many times:


TextTitle
John 1:9the true Light
John 6:32the true Bread
John 15:1the true Vine
Rev. 3:7the true One
Rev. 3:14the true Witness
Rev. 6:10true Sovereign & Lord

5. That the Father is called "true God" in John 17:3 and the Son is called "true God" in I John 5:20 is no more a contradiction than the fact that they are both called the "true One" (I John 5:20 cf. Rev. 3:7).

6. The interpretation that "the true God" refers to the Father leads to a meaningless tautology Lenski explains:

In the first place, if [Greek] has as its antecedent "the real God" (the Father), then the statement is a tautology: John would say: "This real God is the real God." He would say it after having twice said: we know the real God and are in the real God. 197

7. Lastly, the next verse warns us to keep away from idols. There is an obvious contrast between the "true God" and the "false gods" of the heathen. The pagans may worship their "divine heros," such as Adonis, but Christians worship Jesus Christ who is not a [sic] "idol" or "false god," but "the true God."

END QUOTE:I'll add more quotes or links below from other sources as I have time to find or type them out.

Albert Barnes' New Testament Notes (AKA "Barnes' Notes on the Bible") gives FIVE persuasive reasons why "true God" refers to Jesus in 1 John 5:20.

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/barnes/ntnotes.xxvi.v.xx.html








Monday, January 23, 2012

"P" and the "No True Scotsman" Fallacy

version 2.0

Truth Unites... and Divides responding to a comment I posted in this blog said...

This is a highly interesting comment.

I have a derivative question which has puzzled me for some time.

With regards to "P" (the Perseverance of the Saints), how does "P" escape the charge of falling into the "No True Scotsman" fallacy? If someone could help my muddled thinking on this, I'd appreciate it.

Thesis: Only genuine Christians persevere. And never apostasize or deconvert.

Thesis: Michael Sudduth apostasized (or deconverted).

Conclusion: Michael Sudduth was never a genuine Christian (supposing that Michael Sudduth died today and never repudiating Hinduism and Lord Krishna and never repenting of his worship of a false idol).

Question again: How does doctrine of "P" refute the allegation that it's an example of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy?




My response:


Truth Unites... and Divides, there's the logical possibility that God, in His absolute sovereignty, temporarily saves some people only to later take away that salvation by withholding (or taking away) "the gift of final perseverance" (to use Augustine's terminology). In which case, as some Catholic Augustinians claim, God elects some to initial salvation AND to final salvation. But for others, God only elects them to initial salvation. This logical possibility doesn't take away from God's sovereignty even though, like classical Arminianism genuine Christians can fall away. The difference is that in the former God's will is the determining factor in those who fall away, while in the latter it's the person's libertarian will that's the determining factor. Therefore, one could argue that in Augustine's (and Aquinas' and Luther's) view, God is actually more sovereign than in Calvinism because God can be a spiritual "Indian giver" (no ethnic insult/slur intended) taking away a salvation he initially gave (by retracting or withholding altogether the gift of perseverance). This is my interpretation of Augustine's view. Augustinian Catholics would say that God didn't positively reprobate those whom He elected to only grant initial salvation and that it is their own sinfulness that leads them to finally fall away. But I would argue that the mere fact that God intentionally withholds or takes back the gift of final perseverance logically necessitates that God is positively electing them to reprobation since God knows that without His gift of perseverance they cannot do other than fall away.

From my perspective, the major problem with Augustine's view is that it denies that God's love is unchanging. Sure Common Grace can allow for God to love the non-elect in a way less than the elect, but in Augustine's view there would then be three categories of grace: 1. Efficacious Grace (which lasts to and through eternity), 2. Initial Grace (which does not last even though it's nearly identical in basis and kind as the former), and 3. Common Grace (which does not last, but which is dramatically inferior in kind than either 1 or 2) .

Also, how can the Scripture be true that states "He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how will He not also along with Him graciously give us all things [including the gift of perseverance]"? Btw, one's view of the atonement obviously has tremendous ramifications for the doctrine of Perseverance [ see below].

Nevertheless, it could be that the number of the elect and the number of genuine saints aren't coterminous. All this also depends on what one means by a "(genuine) saint". Is one a genuine saint by virtue of regeneration? Does that only mean the Calvinistic understanding of regeneration, or can it include baptismal regeneration (per Augustine, Aquinas, Luther et al.)?

Catholic James Akins section on the Perseverance of the Saints in his paper explains it much better than I can. He makes clear the Augustinian distinction between predestination to initial salvation (election to salvation) and predestination to final salvation (election to glory).


A TIPTOE THROUGH TULIP by James Akin www.ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/TULIP.htm



Above I mentioned Rom. 8:32 and how one's understanding of the atonement could affect the doctrine of Perseverance.

While I'm not dogmatic against it, I now lean less towards "Limited Atonement" (as it is understood by contemporary Calvinists) because of the seemingly legitimate distinctions made by Reformed folks like David Ponter, THEOparadox and websites like Calvin and Calvinism (et al.).

They show that, though forgotten by or unknown to modern Calvinists, there has been a long line of historic Calvinists who affirmed that while the intent of the atonement is limited, the extent was unlimited. So they make a distinction between John Owen's view (and later re-affirmed by John Murray's) of Limited Atonement, and a permissible and historic Calvinistic view of Particular Redemption which affirms Christ did die (in some sense) for the non-elect.

Though, I have to admit that in their debates with the Triabloggers a few months back (primarily with Steve and Paul), the Triabloggers seemed to have had the better arguments.

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Some Advice to Get Healthier and Maintain Health




I'm not a doctor or nutritionist. I have no credentials to give the following medical advice. I'm just relaying some of what I've heard or read from various sources and which I implement in my own life to try and get (and stay) healthy. Consult your doctor before putting into practice anything I've written. After reading this article I recommend you do some research both online and through books to confirm (or dis-confirm) the sorts of things I've written since I'm listing them with the minimum amount of explanation/rationale and since some of the recommendations and benefits are controversial. Many of my recommendations are repeated because they have multiple benefits and the benefits themselves have a synergistic effect on overall health. That only makes sense since every part of the body (and human being) is connected to every other part. To help remember the advice, I've used each vowel in the English language to refer to some aspect of health that needs to be dealt with. If you recall, the vowels of the English language are A-E-I-O-U and sometimes Y (I'm including Y).


A = Acidification

I've read that a body that's more acidic than basic has a greater tendency to get diseases like cancer. My simplified explanation for why that is is that acidic bodies are less oxygenated. Less oxygen allows for cancer, viruses, and bacteria to get a hold on a person's body. While the presence of oxygen inhibits or at least makes it more difficult for them to get a hold on the body. The key here then is getting more oxygen into the body and into your cells by turning your body from being acidic to slightly more basic. This theory is a bit controversial, but the things required to move the body into being a bit more basic are also generally also good for you. So even if the theory is false, you'll still be doing good things for your body. Here are some things you can do.

- Take coral calcium supplements. Calcium and other minerals help turn your body chemistry away from acidic to more basic.

- Get more sunshine since exposure to it causes your body to produce more vitamin D. Vitamin D is necessary for the absorption of calcium.
- Take vitamin D3 supplements (especially, if you don't get much sunshine since you won't be producing enough vitamin D necessary for absorption of calcium and to strengthen your immune system)


- Eat more fruits and vegetables.

- Start rebounding with a trampoline since it both oxygenates the body and gets the lymphatic system flowing to fight off cancer, viruses/bacteria &c.

- Make sure your home and work areas are well ventilated and that you get fresh air from the outside inside. Use an ionic air filter indoors to help purify the air of toxins and dust.

- Deep breathing exercises increases oxygenation of the body.

- Switch from using processed table salt to sea salt (more below).


E = Elimination

While you should be getting good things into your body, you've also got to get the bad things out like waste products and pathogens.

It's been said that "All cancers begin in the colon". That's probably hyperbolic talk. However, the colon is a place where parasites can live; where the bad bacteria can multiply (due to poorly digested food); where toxins can accumulate, and due to poor diets it can often lead to "leaky gut syndrome" which can trigger various diseases and sicknesses. You don't want your immune system fighting multiple fronts. So:

- Make sure to get enough fiber in your diet. If necessary, take fiber supplementation products like Metamucil. I take a generic Walmart Metamucil look-a-like because it's cheaper and because they have a brand that doesn't have added sugar, orange flavor, or food coloring which I assume are all bad for you. Ideally you want a brand that's made from vegetable material which wasn't grown using pesticides (etc.). But finding everything you want in a product can get expensive. Fiber helps flush and sweep the digestive system of impacted fecal matter, bacteria/viruses/parasites. It also slows down the entrance of the sugar you've eaten into your blood stream (and so balancing your blood sugar levels which is important in weight loss or maintenance and in warding off or controlling diabetes).
- At least once a year take an oral colon cleanse product (like Super Cleanse by Nature's Secret). A colonic is probably best, but most people won't do that. When it comes to colonics, they should really only be done with supervision or by a professional because the stimulation of the vagus nerve (that has endings in the rectum) can cause heart beat irregularities.
- Take probiotics. They help return the proper balance of good and bad bacterial flora in the digestive system. It helps continue breaking down undigested food. Also, recent studies suggests that the digestive system is some how connected to the immune system.

- Another area where you need to get the "bad stuff out" is from your cells. Your cells are constantly repairing themselves and fighting off cancer, viruses, bacteria (etc.). To aid in the elimination of those things, make sure to rebound (along with other aerobic and exercises and weight lifting). Rebounding (as noted above) not only gets your blood circulating, but your lymphatic system flowing and so gets your white blood cells to more efficiently fight off disease and pathogens. Rebounding also helps keep the digestive system healthy too. Not to mention the brain, other organs and triggers bone production and strengthening because of the rapidly changing gravity forces from zero to three (or more) times regular G.

- Deep breathing exercises not only gets more oxygen into your system (as noted above), but it also eliminates various metabolized gases out of your system. Slow deep breathing also gets the lymphatic system flowing as well.


I = Inflammation

Systemic bodily inflammation has recently (in the last few years) been indirectly linked to various diseases like heart disease and diabetes.

- Take Omega-3 supplementation (also good for the brain, skin, cardiovascular system and is thermogenic leading to greater caloric burn). I recommend Nordic Naturals Arctic Cod Liver Oil because it's high quality and they have them in various fruit flavors that make them much easier to swallow. Brands in capsule form are usually lower quality.

- Eat more olive oil, fruits and vegetables

- Eliminate as much stress from your life because stress causes your body to produce more cortisol and that promotes inflammation and fat storage. Moreover, stress causes people to eat more food than is necessary to eliminate hunger. Without even thinking about it, people often automatically get something to eat to relieve stress (hence the term "comfort food"). But that temporary relief comes with the price of poor health.

- Don't over exercise. Obviously, this isn't a problem for most people in the Western world. But there are some exercise freaks out there. Too much exercise leads to greater inflammation. If you do exercise, make sure you get proper rest and sleep.

- Go to the dentist and get your teeth fixed. Bad oral hygiene leads to systemic inflammation. Floss daily. Purchase an electronic toothbrush. They not only clean your teeth more effectively, but it saves you time and money. Time, because you don't have to brush longer to thoroughly scrub off plaque and bacteria. Money, because if you keep your teeth healthy, you don't have to constantly spend money paying your dentist to repair your teeth.


O = Oxidation

We all know about the need to take antioxidants. Lowering oxidative stress actually makes you age slower. Well-known TV doctor, Dr. (Memet) Oz recommends supplements like:

- astaxanthin. Some take 5 MG or 10 MG. Others take 5MG twice a day (morning then night). If there's one antioxidant you're going to take, take astaxanthin.

- ubiquinol (a more bio-available form of CoQ10)

- vitamin C (bioflavonoid complex)

- vitamin E

- drink Green Tea (and/or take green tea extract like HerbaSway's green tea extract)

- Eat more berries like blueberries.

U = Unification

Christianity teaches that human beings have both a physical and spiritual aspect to their makeup. I'm setting aside the trichotomy vs. dichotomy in-house debate that theologians have been having for centuries. Though, I do clearly reject a physicalist or materialist Christian anthropology. The reason I include "unification" is because whatever affects the body also affect the spirit and mind; just as whatever affects the spirit and mind also affects the body. So, if you want to get healthier physically or spiritually, you should deal with both. Recommendations:

- Pray, read the Bible, and mediate on God's truth found in Christian books and supremely and infallibly in God's Word, the Bible. Cultivating one's spiritual and devotional life also has bodily effects. God should be worshipped regardless of whether it's beneficial to the body or not. In fact, obedience to God sometimes results in bodily injury and even death (e.g. martyrdom). Nevertheless, it just so happens that worshipping God is not only good for the spirit, but ALSO good for the body (generally speaking). We shouldn't neglect the body because it is the temple of the Holy Spirit (cf. 1 Cor. ch. 3; ch. 6; 2 Cor. ch. 6) and our vehicle in this world to fulfill God's assignment and destiny for our lives.

- Forgive others and have a forgiving attitude. Unforgiveness, bitterness, anger and personal (subjective) feelings of guilt have been shown to be connected with various diseases of the body and mind like heart disease and neuroses.

-Practice Biblical contentment and thankfulness. When one is content and thankful to God, rather than trying to keep up with the "Joneses", one will be less stressed and more happy.

- Get enough sleep. Lack of sleep affects both body and mind. Lack of sleep contributes to stress, and stress contributes to weight gain because it results in the production of cortisol. Both contribute to various sicknesses and diseases. Lack of sleep leads to mental fogginess. Adequate sleep makes you a more effective thinker, planner, and doer. There are certain chemicals and hormones that are needed and produced during sleep which are necessary to maintain bodily health. If possible sleep at the same time every night in order to set your circadian rhythm. People who get irregular sleep (e.g. people who work the graveyard shift) often have greater incidents of cancer. Sleep in a totally dark room otherwise you will not produce certain necessary hormones because your brain can sense exposure to light through your eyes even with your eyelids closed. The ideal amount of sleep is around 8 or 9 hours. But since most of us are too busy to get that amount, make sure you get at least 6 hours (not including the time needed to doze off). Lack of sleep affects work productivity worldwide and contributes to many car accidents and fatalities.


- Expose yourself to some sunshine. Your skin needs exposure to the sunshine to produce vitamin D. Other than during summer months, people who live greater than 37 degree north or south of the equator don't get enough sunshine to produce adequate amounts of vitamin D. New research shows that adequate vitamin D is essential for overall health because it affects SOOO many areas of the body. Do a google search and you'll find how vital this vitamin is. Just as it's important that your eyes aren't exposed to light while you're sleeping to produce certain hormones, so it is important that your eyes DO get (indirectly) exposed to sunlight in order to produce other necessary hormones (when you're awake). Eye exposure should be without an intervening window, or prescription eye glasses. Obviously, never look directly into the sun or any light source. It's also been shown that exposure to sunlight can prevent, minimize or help treat depression. Similarly the use of artificial sunlight during winter has been used to help treat SAD (seasonal affective disorder).
-Ill health can lead to depression, just as depression can lead to ill health (due to the inactivity and indifference that results from it). Therefore the two together can spiral out of control. As Christians we are commanded to "rejoice always, [to] pray without ceasing, [and] in everything [to] give thanks, for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus [for us]." Faith, prayer, contentment, thankfulness, and praise are the Scriptures' cure for depression. The Bible also has a prescriptions for bodily health and healing (see below). Spiritual depression is a major problem in the Church as well. Often God uses spiritual depression to teach us lessons, but that doesn't mean we should welcome it since God can also use other evils (whether natural or moral ones perpetrated by other on us or by us). I recommend D. Martyn-Lloyd Jones' classic book, "Spiritual Depression". I'd also recommend the charismatic book by Merlin Carothers titled "Power in Praise." While the author isn't a Calvinist, the principles in the book actually fit better in a Calvinistic view of providence , theodicy, and sanctification. Though, the wording and phrasing could be better put.

- Spend time with family and friends. Loneliness has been linked to depression and both are linked to an early death. Community cultivates and sustains one's emotional and psychological life. Again, what's good for the mind/heart/emotions/spirit is also good for the body and vice versa. Those who are happily married live longer than those who are not married. Even people who live alone and have a pet tend to live longer than those who live alone and don't have a pet. Obviously, there are dangers in too much community. Just as loneliness can be detrimental, so can over-socializing and excessive networking. It can take away from one's devotional life and peace of mind. Sometimes the mind and spirit just needs to be quiet in God's presence. Speaking of networking and communication, texting while driving is 23 times more dangerous than driving drunk. Pass that fact along to all the teenagers you know.

Y = YOU Are What YOU Eat/Drink/Take/Expose YOURSELF To

- Avoid foods that are processed and contain pesticides, hormones, parasites, bacteria.

- Avoid saturated fats, trans fats as well as hydrogenated (or partially hydrogenated) oils and fats.

- Eat the good fats like those found in olive oil, flax seed oil, avocados, walnuts, and cold-water fish. Or take fish oil supplements which have high concentrations of Omega-3 fatty acids.


- Use sea salt instead of regular processed table salt. Sea salt contains minerals table salt is missing. Table salt is not only not as nutritious, but may even be harmful for you. The link between salt intake and high blood pressure might not be due to the levels of sodium but the quality of the salt we're normally ingesting. Processed table salt is not only striped of the minerals naturally found in salt, but is also processed using extreme heat (dried at over 1200 degrees Fahrenheit) that chemically alters its structure. It's an unnatural inorganic form of salt that your body recognizes are foreign. Also, chemicals like iodine, fluoride, and aluminum hydroxide are added to it to make the salt pourable and to preserve it so that it has an indefinite shelf life. Sea salt on the other hand is not only less bad, but actually positively good for you. The only negative thing about sea salt is that it;s a poor source of iodine which is needed for proper thyroid function. Hopefully, you get your needed iodine by eating enough seafood (and even seaweed/kelp). Here are some recommended brands of sea salt (listed in order of mineral content):
Selina Naturally Hawaiian Salt;
Celtic Sea Salt;
Selina Naturally Portuguese Sea Salt;
Himalayan Sea Salt.

- As much as possible, avoid processed sugar and food products that use HFCS (high fructose corn syrup). HFCS enters the blood stream faster than complex carbohydrates and contributes to obesity because a spike in blood sugar causes the production of insulin in the body. It's your body's response to lower the amount of excess sugar in the blood. Insulin is a hormone that promotes the accumulation of fat into fat cells. Over time, people's bodies begin to experience insulin resistance which causes the body to produce increasingly greater amounts of insulin than previously needed in order get the intended result of lowering the level of sugar in the bloodstream. However, that often causes an extreme drop in blood sugar levels, which itself triggers hunger and so people end up eating more food more frequently. The result is a cyclical yo-yo effect of 1. over-eating, 2. excessive insulin production, 3. drop in blood sugar levels, 4. then back again to #1. of over-eating (after only a few hours). This is what happens during pre-diabetes. This is why one of the keys to weight loss and maintenance is to keep your blood sugar level stable by making sure you eat small meals and don't go more than 5 hours without eating. It's often been said that we should eat more frequent but smaller meals like children whose metabolisms are much faster in comparison to adults. It's also known that sugar weakens the immune system. Therefore, if one is fighting cancer, removing sugar from the diet is absolutely essential. I won't even get into how excess sugar promotes candida. Diabetes should be avoided at all cost because it can lead to blindness, amputation, and other diseases.

- Soda pops like Coke or Pepsi have many tablespoonfuls of sugar. So STOP drinking soda/pop. Besides the sugar, soda eats away at your teeth and leeches your bones of calcium (because of the excessive phosphoric acid in soda).

- Almost all drugs deprive you of certain nutrients you body needs. See Suzy Cohen's book "Drug Muggers".

- Eat "living foods" with live enzymes like fruits and vegetables. If you have the time and money, purchase a juicer and start juicing. At the very least, juice raw organic carrots with a little bit of raw organic broccoli once a week.
- Eat high quality protein (e.g. fish like salmon etc.) rather than processed meats like hotdogs. If you have to eat processed meat products, then go with Kosher approved meats since they are leaner, probably have lesser sodium nitrite content, as well as other unwanted "ingredients" [grin] (I won't mention some of the rumors about the percentages of allowable accidental unmentionable "ingredients" in the average commercial hotdog).

- Minimize (not eliminate) the amount of red meat you eat. There are certain nutrients that are more difficult to get apart from eating red meat. But excessive red meat contributes to coronary heart disease.

- Drink green tea in place of coffee. It'll give you the caffeine fix you need, but with less gitters and with added (higher) antioxidant benefits. Find a good (preferrably organic) green tea that has the level of caffeine you want. For example, I've noticed that Impra Green Tea has a much higher caffeine content than Ten Ren Green Tea. However, too much caffeine isn't good for you either since it triggers the fight or flight response in the body and can over work the adrenal glands.

- Drink plenty of water. The purer the better. Filtered is better than tap. Certain bottled waters are better than filtered tap water. Reverse osmosis water is even better. The problem with bottled water is that the plastic leaks into the water and is bad or you. But sometimes bottled water is the best you can get. The goal is to minimize the amount of chlorine and fluoride you're drinking. Unfortunately, almost all water supplies and sources in the Western world contain pharmaceuticals because they are nearly impossible to filter out. People also flush unused drugs down the toilet. Even then, the drugs that are used is excreted into the toilet and eventually enters the water supply. Moreover, certain companies continue to dump pharmaceuticals and other chemicals into lakes and rivers.

See this link as for a random website exposing this growing problem.

- Take supplements
including a good multi-vitamin (Solgar brand supplements are a good place to start). Take things like vitamin C, ashwaganda (for stress and balancing of hormones), chromium picolinate (for fat loss), B-complex; coral calcium (I recommend Coral LLC's Coral Complex), garlic (either the food or supplement form), beta-carotene (either by juicing carrots or supplements), wheat germ &c.

- Occasional fasting is not only good for the spirit, but it's also good for your body. At the very least it gives your digestive system a rest. It also forces your body to "tune itself up" for lack of a better phrase. The internet is full articles documenting the physical benefits of regular fasting.
- Quit or minimize your smoking. There are various chemicals in most cigarettes that are carcinogenic. Cigars probably have lesser amounts of those chemicals. However one cigar can have as much nicotine as 1-3 packs of cigarettes. So, if you smoke, smoke cigars and don't inhales (as most cigar smokers don't inhale but merely "taste" the smoke).
- Quit or minimize the amount of alcohol you drink. Moderate drinking can actually be beneficial for your health. However, if you don't drink, there's no reason to start drinking.
- Monitor what you allow to enter your mind through movies, music, books, and people. For example, instead of watching the latest horror movie that everyone has been talking about, go outside and enjoy God's creation. Soak in the sunshine, the fresh air, and the beautiful surroundings that you might be missing because you're spending too much time in front your computer (or book) trapped inside uninspiring man made walls. This one could have gone under "Unification" as well as "You are what you Eat/Drink/Take/Expose Yourself To"



Finally Exercise

While I've used up all the vowels of the English alphabet, I can't leave out mentioning the importance of living a physically active life. It's a well known fact that obesity and heart disease is the #1 killer in the Western world. Even above that of cancer. I've heard on many occasions various doctors state that if they could only give one prescription for promoting health which they knew (without doubt) their patient would take, the first and greatest prescription would be that of exercise and increased physical activity. Here's a shocking quote I recently read.

"Sitting for most of the day increases the risk of heart attack by 54% according to experts at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, La. What's scarier is that sitting is an "independent risk factor," meaning that even if you go to the gym on your lunch break and don't smoke, it doesn't make up for being a deskchair potato. Try elevating your computer and keyboard so that you can stand at your desk." - taken from Parade magazine" Sunday, June 19, 2011 edition page 14

Here's a link to a Men's Health article that talks about the same thing (click here)

- We all know the benefits of aerobic exercise for the cardiovascular system. But most people don't know the added benefits of 1. interval training and 2. cross training. Simply googling up those two training methods will show their additional benefits beyond regular monotonous exercise.
- I've already mentioned twice the benefits of rebounding (exercise that uses a mini-trampoline). Suffice it to say that NASA has stated that rebounding is "the most efficient and effective exercise yet devised by man." Even if that's not true, it's clearly one of the most efficient and effective. It's also a low to non-impact form of exercise.
42 Ways the Body Responds to Rebounding
- Weight lifting and training is not only good for bone formation (strengthening, hardening, maintenance) but also for possibly halting the onset of diabetes. Many people in the Western world (e.g. many in the United States) are already pre-diabetic. Also greater muscle mass burns greater calories and fat faster. Focus on the large muscle groups like thighs, hamstrings, buttocks, core and back.


- Speaking of backs, I want to mention the debilitating nature of back pain and loss of income due to it. Back/neck pain is a major problem for many people and it leads to greater loss of health (because one can't exercise) and loss of income because one can't work (or work productively). It also leads to a lower quality of life and an inability to enjoy and attend to one's friends and family. This is why it's so important to maintain a strong back. To do so, it also requires exercising one's stomach and core muscles because they complement and balance each other.

- Stretching is a much neglected exercise. But it is needed because a lack of flexibility can lead to injuries, and injuries can lead to other health problems if you can't exercise. Also, poor flexibility is a possible symptom of cardiovascular problems.

- If possible, switch your shoes at least once a day and use shoe insoles that make standing and walking comfortable. I recommend Dr. Scholl's Massaging Gel insoles. Doing these things are good for your posture, your feet, and your mood (because of lessened pain and greater comfort). You'll appreciate this advice if you take seriously the importance of staying off your butt and standing up in order to lower your risk of dying from a heart attack.

- Losing fat on your body is important because there are toxins and chemicals that are stored and trapped in it. In fact, losing weight quickly can actually make one sick because of the amount of toxins released into the system. That's why gradual fat loss is recommended. It also goes without saying that the more obese one is, the less likely one will exercise; and the less exercise someone has, the more likely he will be obese. Again, another case of two or more things that re-enforce each other and can spiral out of control.



General resources I recommend (I'll continue adding to this list)

Read (the books and blogs) of and watch (on TV and Youtube) the following experts. Of course, when researching their materials watch out for any New Age teachings that may conflict with Christian teachings and beliefs. Use discernment by "chewing the meat, and spitting out the bones".

More Reputable experts that I recommend
Dr. Memet Oz (i.e. the well known TV personality with his own show named, "The Dr. Oz Show")
Dr. Mark Hyman
Dr. Suzy Cohen
Dr. Mike Roizen
Dr. Mark Stengler



Less Reputable experts that I recommend
Dr. Nicholas Perricone
Dr. Joseph Mercola
Dr. Andrew Weil
Keith Nemec (I recommend his books Total Health = Wholeness: A Body, Mind, and Spirit Manual; and his Seven Basic Steps to Total Health)

Recommended books:

The Blue Zones by Dan Buettner
YOU: The Owner's Manual, Updated and Expanded by Michael F. Roizen and Mehmet C. Oz
You: Staying Young: The Owner's Manual for Extending Your Warranty by Michael F. Roizen and Mehmet C. Oz



Here's a link to a Triablogue blog where I made comments on my views on Divine Healing

When I'm done, this will be a link to a future blog on my views of Divine Healing and my recommendations (blog not yet written)

Like all my other blogs, I'll continue adding to and editing this article.